To contribute to this wiki, please contact bikebikeeverywhere@gmail.com if you would like us to create you an account. The Contribute to this Wiki page goes into detail about how to make contributions and what information should be included.
Para contribuir a este wiki, por favor escribe a bikebikeeverywhere@gmail.com si deseas que creemos una cuenta para ti. La página Contribute to this Wiki explica en detalle cómo hacer contribuciones y qué información debe incluirse.
Tech meeting 2022.08.11: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* jonathan - https://feathersjs.com/comparison | * jonathan - https://feathersjs.com/comparison | ||
* godwin would use mongo if starting now | * godwin would use mongo if starting now | ||
* jonathan - feathers handles sockets, too. supposed to be really easy to use. any socket library you want to use. extremely versatile. just a framework that creates api. not locked into anything. | |||
* godwin - if we use nextjs and feathers (looks from google like lots of people do that) would we have one server that does api and one that does rendering or would we want one service/stack that does service and rendering? | |||
* jonathan - | |||
Revision as of 03:28, 12 August 2022
Agenda
- Updates on anything Darin's been doing
- Ideas / questions from Jonathan and Godwin re: planning for a weekend coding sprint
- Check in about scheduling the weekend coding sprint
- godwin - API on serverside.
- maybe nextjs on front and back
- richtext rendered on the front end and ??? on the back
- boilerplate out there now should be pretty easy to get off the ground
- jonathan - is using feathers. feathersjs -there's not a good comparison to nextjs
- godwin - react stable, been used for years, seems like it's sticking around - what is feathersjs? react?
- jonathan - easy way to put together an API. featthers just handles API. you write usenode you use js to write it. database agnostic. mongo, psql, etc
- godwin - sounds like maybe we could use both
- jonathan - https://feathersjs.com/comparison
- godwin would use mongo if starting now
- jonathan - feathers handles sockets, too. supposed to be really easy to use. any socket library you want to use. extremely versatile. just a framework that creates api. not locked into anything.
- godwin - if we use nextjs and feathers (looks from google like lots of people do that) would we have one server that does api and one that does rendering or would we want one service/stack that does service and rendering?
- jonathan -